Michele Turetta | Darts Profile, Stats & Results

This Michele Turetta darts profile pulls together the key numbers that matter when you?re assessing form, match-up fit and likely match flow. On DartsStats.com you can track averages, doubling, 180 rates and performance splits across formats to build a clearer picture than a headline result ever can. Use this page as a practical checklist: what Turetta tends to do well, where variance shows up, and which stats are most predictive for different bet types and match lengths.

Player Snapshot

Full Name and Nickname (If Used)

Full name: Michele Turetta
Nickname: If a widely used nickname appears on official entry lists or broadcasts, treat it as a label rather than a performance indicator. Nicknames don?t win legs; scoring and doubling do.

Country and Tour Status

Country: Italy
Tour status: Turetta?s appearances are typically tied to the events he qualifies for (for example, floor events, qualifiers, and selected stage tournaments). When evaluating ?tour status?, focus less on the label and more on the evidence: match volume in the last 3?6 months, strength of opposition, and whether he?s playing regularly enough for stats to stabilise.

• More matches = truer baseline: a 10-match sample can swing sharply with one hot (or cold) session.
• Opposition quality matters: a strong average against lower-level opponents can drop when the checkout pressure rises versus elite finishers.

Best-Of Formats and Typical Strengths

Without assuming a fixed ?best format?, the most useful approach is to identify which parts of Turetta?s game hold up as the distance increases:

• Short formats (best of 9?11 legs): variance is higher; a couple of missed doubles or one purple patch can decide the match. Look for early scoring speed (First 9) and whether he ?starts on time?.
• Medium formats (best of 13?19 legs): sustained scoring and repeatable doubling patterns become more predictive.
• Longer formats/sets: mental reset and rhythm matter more; players with reliable combination finishing can edge tight sets even if scoring is similar.

Playing Style

Scoring Profile (T20 Heavy, Switching, Tempo)

Turetta?s scoring profile is best assessed through three lenses on DartsStats.com: First 9 average (how he scores in the opening phase), treble distribution (how often he relies on T20), and visit volatility (how spiky the scoring is across legs).

• T20-heavy approach: If his treble share leans towards T20, you?ll often see clearer 180 potential but also the occasional ?flat? leg when the bed isn?t there.
• Switching to 19s/18s: If the data shows frequent switches, that can stabilise scoring in longer matches and reduce 26/41-type visits when T20 is blocked.
• Tempo impact: A player with a consistent tempo can be more predictable for leg totals; erratic tempo can show up as streaky patches (two legs won quickly, then a lull).

Finishing Profile (Preferred Doubles, Checkout Tendencies)

Finishing is where many matches are won and lost at this level. Rather than guessing a ?favourite double?, check Turetta?s checkout map and the distribution of doubles hit in recent events.

• Preferred doubles: Many right-handers naturally land on D20/D16 routes; if Turetta?s data shows a higher hit rate on, say, D16 than D20, it can influence how you interpret missed doubles in a match.
• Checkout tendencies: Look for whether he converts mid-range outs (60?100) at a reliable clip. A player who repeatedly takes out 76, 84, 96 under pressure can flip matches even when outscored.
• Big-finish capability: High checkout frequency isn?t just highlight material; it?s a clue to whether he can ?steal? legs against the throw.

Pace and Rhythm Notes

Pace is often discussed loosely, but it can be analysed practically:

• Fast starters: if the First 9 average spikes in the opening 3?4 legs, he may be a better fit for markets tied to early legs (for example, ?first to 3 legs?).
• Rhythm-dependent patches: a player whose averages swing widely session-to-session may be more sensitive to stage lighting, timing gaps, or opponent tempo.
• Pressure response: check how his doubling holds when matches go deep (deciders, last-leg situations).

Key Stats on DartsStats.com

3-Dart Average and First 9 Average

The 3-dart average is the headline metric, but it can hide how the match actually played out. Pair it with First 9 average to separate scoring power from finishing variance.

• If First 9 is strong but 3-dart average is modest: doubling likely dragged the overall figure down (missed doubles or awkward set-ups).
• If 3-dart average is high but First 9 is average: it can indicate excellent finishing and combination play, or a match where the opponent gifted chances.

When comparing matches, look for consistency across multiple events rather than one-off peaks.

Checkout Percentage and Missed Doubles

Checkout percentage is one of the most actionable stats, but it needs context. A 40% checkout rate in a match with many visits at doubles can be more impressive than 50% from a small number of attempts.

• Missed doubles per leg: this helps you separate ?bad doubling? from ?few chances?.
• Quality of chances: were the attempts mostly at D20/D16, or scattered across awkward doubles after poor set-ups?
• Pressure moments: if missed doubles cluster in legs against throw or late in the match, that?s a risk factor for close-score markets.

180 Rate and High Checkout Trends

For totals and prop-style thinking, two trends are especially useful:

• 180 rate (per leg or per match): tells you whether a ?180 line? is realistic in the format.
• High checkout trend: frequency of 100+ finishes can signal that he?s creating (and taking) high-value opportunities, not just mopping up at double 1.

Remember that 180s are high-variance in short formats. Use longer samples and similar opposition when possible.

Legs and Sets Performance Splits

Not all matches are created equal. DartsStats.com splits can help you spot where Turetta?s results change by environment and structure:

• Legs vs sets: some players are stronger in straight legs where momentum matters; others manage set play better with resets and targeted bursts.
• Decider performance: a meaningful indicator for ?to win 1+ leg after going behind? type narratives, and for judging resilience.
• On throw vs against throw: break-and-hold rates are critical for handicaps and correct-score angles.

Recent Form and Performance Trends

Last 10?20 Matches Summary

Your most reliable read is a blended view of the last 10?20 matches, weighted slightly towards the most recent events. For Turetta, focus on:

• Average band: is he generally living in one scoring range, or swinging between very high and very low?
• Doubling stability: are missed doubles creeping up even when scoring is fine?
• Opponent calibre: a ?good run? can be less meaningful if it came against players with low hold percentages.

Where possible, compare like-for-like: floor matches to floor matches, stage matches to stage matches, and similar best-of distances.

Stage vs Floor Differences (If Relevant)

If Turetta?s sample includes both stage and floor darts, treat them as different conditions:

• Stage: timing gaps, walk-ons, and a different feel to the throw can affect rhythm. Some players tighten up on doubles; others elevate.
• Floor: often more ?repeatable?; higher match volume can stabilise stats, but the standard can vary widely across rounds.

A practical approach is to track whether his checkout percentage drops meaningfully on stage, even if scoring remains similar.

Form Indicators to Watch

These are the ?tell? stats that often move before results do:

• First 9 average trending up: suggests scoring confidence and better leg control.
• Fewer missed doubles per leg: indicates cleaner set-ups and calmer finishing.
• More breaks of throw: a sign he?s applying pressure earlier in legs, not relying solely on holding.
• Reduced visit volatility: fewer very low scoring visits can keep him competitive even on an average day.

Career Highlights

Major Titles and Notable Runs

Turetta?s standout moments are best framed in terms of level reached and quality of performance rather than just trophies. Notable runs (deep pushes in qualifiers, strong showings in floor events, or wins over higher-ranked opposition) are especially relevant when they come with supportive underlying stats: strong First 9, solid hold percentage, and a sustainable checkout rate.

Breakthrough Moments and Milestones

Milestones to look for on a developing profile include:

• First sustained period above a key average band across multiple events.
• Improved doubling under pressure (fewer late-match misses, better conversion in tight legs).
• More competitive legs won against higher-quality throwers, indicating he can break rather than just hold.

Rivalries and Signature Matches

Darts ?rivalries? often form through repeated meetings on the floor. If Turetta has a pattern of struggles or success versus a particular type of opponent (heavy 180 hitter, rapid tempo player, clinical finisher), treat it as a style note, not destiny. The most trustworthy clue is whether the match-ups consistently show the same weakness (for example, being out-finished from similar chances).

Best Matchups and Risk Factors

Opponents and Styles That Suit

In general, Turetta is more likely to look value-aligned (from a betting analysis perspective) when:

• He faces opponents with lower hold percentage, giving him more break chances.
• The opponent?s scoring is inconsistent, allowing Turetta?s steadier legs to matter more.
• There?s evidence his checkout routes match well against the pace of the game (for example, he regularly sets up two-dart finishes while the opponent leaves bogey numbers).

Common Weak Spots (If Any)

Rather than labelling fixed flaws, use the stats to test for recurring risk factors:

• Doubling drift: if checkout percentage drops while scoring stays steady, the match becomes harder to control.
• Slow starts: if First 9 is consistently below his match average early on, short formats become dangerous.
• Low 180 frequency: can make it tougher to win shootouts versus high-power scorers unless finishing is elite.

Format and Distance Effects

Distance shapes how much the ?true level? wins out:

• Short best-of: one or two missed doubles can flip a handicap bet; totals can be skewed by a quick 5?1 either way.
• Longer best-of: the better scorer tends to assert more often; look for whether Turetta?s scoring base is strong enough to keep him in touch if finishing normalises.

How to Use This Profile

What to Check Before a Match

Use this pre-match checklist on DartsStats.com:

• Last 10 matches: 3-dart average trend and First 9 trend.
• Doubling: checkout percentage and missed doubles per leg; note any recent extremes.
• Break ability: legs won against throw and overall break rate.
• Format fit: best-of distance, legs vs sets, and whether it?s stage or floor.
• 180 profile: per-leg 180 rate for both players, not just one.

Interpreting Stats Without Overreacting

Darts is a high-variance sport, especially in short formats. Avoid treating a single big average as a ?new level? unless it?s supported by:

• Similar performances across multiple matches, and
• A stable First 9 (scoring) and stable checkout percentage (finishing), and
• Comparable conditions (same event type and match length).

Also be cautious with headline ?checkout percentage? in tiny samples. A player going 4/6 on doubles (66.7%) can look clinical, but it may simply reflect few opportunities.

Tracking Improvements Over Time

The cleanest way to track real improvement is to plot rolling windows (last 10, last 20) and watch for:

• Rising floor average (bad matches getting less bad).
• Better set-up play (fewer darts at awkward doubles; fewer missed doubles per leg).
• More breaks against competent holders, not just weaker opposition.

Two practical betting scenarios (educational examples)

Scenario 1: Legs handicap in a short best-of match
Imagine a best of 11 legs where your read is that Turetta?s scoring is slightly lower, but his recent checkout percentage has been solid and he?s holding throw consistently. A common angle is a conservative handicap such as Turetta +1.5 legs. That bet wins if the score is 6?5, 6?4, 5?6, 4?6, etc., and only loses if he?s beaten by 2+ legs (for example 6?4 against him).
If the market offers something like 1.91 (decimal odds) for +1.5 legs, you?d be backing a close match rather than needing him to win. Use DartsStats.com to check: (a) decider frequency, (b) missed doubles per leg (to reduce blow-up risk), and (c) whether the opponent frequently wins by margin.

Scenario 2: Total legs based on hold/break profiles
In a best of 11, an Over 9.5 legs bet needs a scoreline such as 6?4 or 6?5 (10 or 11 legs). If you see on DartsStats.com that both players have high hold rates and neither breaks often, the match can naturally drift long even without massive averages.
Example: if Over 9.5 is priced at 2.10, you?re effectively saying a long match is more likely than the price suggests. Before committing, check whether Turetta has a pattern of quick defeats (low hold, high missed doubles) in similar best-of formats, because that?s what tends to kill overs early.

FAQs

What is Michele Turetta’s best format?

The most accurate answer comes from his splits: compare his results and averages in short best-of leg matches versus longer formats and any set play. If his First 9 and checkout rate remain stable as distance increases, longer formats may suit; if he starts fast but fades, shorter matches can be better.

What are Michele Turetta’s strongest stats?

Look for the stats where he repeatedly outperforms his own baseline: a consistently strong First 9 average (scoring power), a steady checkout percentage (finishing reliability), or above-average legs won against throw (break ability). The ?strongest? stat is the one that persists across multiple events.

What should you look for in Michele Turetta’s recent form?

Prioritise the last 10?20 matches for trends in 3-dart average, First 9 average, and missed doubles per leg. Also check whether any improvement came against similar opposition and under similar conditions (stage vs floor).

Which doubles does Michele Turetta prefer?

Use the checkout/doubles breakdown to see where his finishing clusters (often D20/D16 routes for many players). The key is not preference alone, but conversion rate and what happens when he?s forced off his favoured double.

Does Michele Turetta perform better on stage or floor?

Compare stage and floor splits: averages, checkout percentage, and missed doubles per leg. If scoring stays similar but doubling drops on stage, that suggests pressure sensitivity; if both improve, he may thrive under lights.

How often does Michele Turetta hit 180s?

Check his 180 rate per leg (or per match) across a meaningful sample. In short matches, 180s can swing wildly, so a longer view (last 20+ where available) gives a truer estimate than a single event.

The Final Throw

Michele Turetta?s profile is most useful when you treat it as a process: confirm his current scoring level with First 9, sanity-check finishing with checkout percentage and missed doubles per leg, then consider whether the match format amplifies or reduces variance. The best reads usually come from combinations of stats, not one headline number.

When you?re building a view for handicaps, totals, or player props, keep your comparisons like-for-like (event type, distance, opposition quality) and don?t overweight one hot match. If the data points in the same direction across the last 10?20 matches, that?s when a trend becomes actionable.

Betting should always be approached responsibly. Set limits, avoid chasing losses, and treat darts markets as entertainment backed by research rather than certainty.