Daryl Gurney | Darts Profile, Stats & Results

Daryl Gurney is one of the most watchable pressure players of the modern era: a proven stage performer with the ability to put together ruthless bursts of scoring and hold his nerve in key legs. This Daryl Gurney darts profile, stats & results page is built to help you understand what his numbers usually mean in real matches, what tends to drive his wins and losses, and how to read form without getting misled by short samples. Everything in this guide is designed to be used alongside the filters and match pages on DartsStats.com, so you can check performance in the exact format, event type, and opponent profile you?re analysing.

Player Snapshot

Full Name and Nickname (If Used)

• Full name: Daryl Gurney
• Common nickname: ?Superchin? (often used by fans and commentators)
• Why it matters for stats tracking: Make sure you?re viewing the correct player profile when filtering historical matches; some platforms abbreviate names, but DartsStats.com keeps a consistent record across tours and events.

Country and Tour Status

• Country: Northern Ireland
• Tour status: Long-time PDC competitor (tour status can change by season; always verify the current year?s activity in the match list and event filters)
• Typical schedule: A mix of floor events and televised/stage events, making it useful to compare stage vs floor splits rather than relying on one blended average.

Best-Of Formats and Typical Strengths

Gurney has historically shown value in formats where composure and experience can outweigh pure peak-scoring. In best-of-leg matches (especially mid-length ties), he often looks most reliable when his doubling is stable and his first-9 scoring keeps him within one visit of opponents. In longer formats, his ability to reset after missed darts can be a plus, but you should pay close attention to momentum swings and whether he?s converting early breaks.

• Often suits: Best-of-11/13 legs on stage; also competitive in floor matches when scoring rhythm is set early.
• Common edge: Punishing opponents? missed doubles; holding throw through steady 60?100 scoring rather than needing constant 140s.
• Common swing factor: Checkout efficiency in the 70?120 range (where a single clean visit can flip a leg).

Playing Style

Scoring Profile (T20 Heavy, Switching, Tempo)

Gurney?s baseline approach is typically T20-led, with switching when the treble bed is blocked or when a specific setup demands it. When he?s playing well, his scoring tends to come in clusters: a pair of solid visits (100+ followed by 100+) that puts pressure on opponents? finishing. When he?s off, you?ll often see more 60s and 41/45-type visits that leave him chasing.

• Primary scoring lane: T20
• Switch tendency: Pragmatic rather than flashy; switches are usually ?need-based? (cover shots, setup requirements) rather than constant lane-hopping
• What to track: First 9 average vs overall average (a strong first 9 with a flat overall can indicate doubling or messy setups)

Finishing Profile (Preferred Doubles, Checkout Tendencies)

Finishing is where many matches are won and lost, and Gurney is a good example of why you should separate ?checkout percentage? from ?how he actually got the chance?. He can be very effective when his setups are tidy (leaving a preferred double rather than an awkward split). He?s also capable of big finishes under pressure, but those are less predictable than repeatable traits like leaving a manageable outshot.

• Common finishing pattern: Prefers straightforward routes that keep a single-double finish alive
• Checkout tendencies: When under pressure, he often opts for percentage routes rather than forcing the hero shot
• What to check: Missed doubles count in matches he lost narrowly; it often tells you whether the defeat was performance-based or variance-driven

Pace and Rhythm Notes

Gurney?s pace is generally steady and deliberate, and that matters when comparing him against fast throwers or players who thrive on rapid tempo. If an opponent tries to speed up the rhythm, watch the first few legs: does Gurney settle into his routine quickly, or does he start with loose first darts?

• Best indicator: First 3?5 legs scoring consistency (are there early 60s/45s, or immediate 100+ stability?)
• Pressure response: Can lift on stage, particularly when the match has a clear narrative (comeback legs, crowd moments)

Key Stats on DartsStats.com

3-Dart Average and First 9 Average

Your starting point should be the 3-dart average, but the sharper read is the split between first 9 average and match average. For Gurney, a healthy first 9 often correlates with him creating chances even if doubling fluctuates. Conversely, a low first 9 can be a red flag: it means he?s not getting to a finish quickly enough, so even decent doubling may not rescue the match.

• Use case: If first 9 is strong but the match average is only moderate, he likely had finishing or setup inefficiency.
• Use case: If both first 9 and overall average are down, expect fewer break chances and more reliance on opponent mistakes.
• Tip: Compare these numbers against the opponent?s first 9, not just the overall averages.

Checkout Percentage and Missed Doubles

Checkout percentage can be noisy over small samples, so pair it with missed doubles and the number of darts at doubles. Two matches can show the same checkout percentage but very different stories: one might feature few chances (poor scoring), another many chances squandered (volatile doubling).

• Good sign: Stable checkout percentage with a reasonable missed-doubles count in wins and losses
• Warning sign: High missed doubles in consecutive matches, especially if those matches were close on legs
• Context check: Look at ?doubles hit / attempts? rather than percentage alone.

180 Rate and High Checkout Trends

Gurney can hit 180s in bunches when his T20 bed is dialled in. The 180 rate is most useful when you compare it to his first 9: a player can score well without huge maximums, but a spike in 180 rate can signal sharper grouping and more frequent 12?15 dart legs.

• 180 rate: Best used as a supporting metric for form and scoring sharpness
• High checkouts: Treat as ?bonus outcomes? rather than a core expectation; use trends (frequency of 100+ checkouts) more than single highlights
• Practical angle: If he?s not scoring heavily but is producing timely 100+ checkouts, that can be a short-term patch rather than a sustainable edge.

Legs and Sets Performance Splits

Different formats reward different strengths. In legs-only matches, early breaks and holding throw are key. In sets play, timing matters: dropping one loose leg can cost a set. When reviewing Gurney?s results, use the format filter and compare:

• Legs-only: Does he hold throw reliably? Does he convert break chances quickly?
• Sets: Does his performance dip at the end of sets (key checkout legs) or start slowly?
• Deciders: If the data shows many deciders, check whether he is winning them due to strong doubling or simply because he?s reaching more chances.

Recent Form and Performance Trends

Last 10-20 Matches Summary

The most useful sample for darts form is often the last 10?20 matches, but only if you split by event type. Use DartsStats.com to group recent matches by:

• Opposition level: Was he facing elite scorers repeatedly, or a softer run of opponents?
• Match format: Best-of-11 legs on floor can look very different from a longer stage match.
• Performance stability: Look for repeated patterns (e.g., strong first 9 but shaky doubles across several matches).

When Gurney?s recent numbers show a steady first 9 and a gradually improving checkout rate, that is usually a healthier sign than one isolated 105+ average in a single match.

Stage vs Floor Differences (If Relevant)

Many players show meaningful differences between floor and stage conditions. For Gurney, stage matches can sometimes bring out his competitive edge, but the most important point is to avoid mixing environments when assessing ?form?. A player can look average on the floor yet raise his level under lights, or vice versa.

• Check: Stage-only averages and checkout rate vs floor-only
• Look for: Whether missed doubles increase on stage (pressure effect) or decrease (better focus and adrenaline)
• Decision tip: If a match is on stage, weight stage splits more heavily even if the overall last-10 is driven by floor results.

Form Indicators to Watch

• First 9 average trend: A gentle upward trend is often more predictive than a single spike.
• Legs won per match: Even in losses, competitive leg counts can indicate he?s close to turning results.
• Closing efficiency: Are his wins clean (few missed doubles), or are they messy and opponent-dependent?
• Scoring depth: How often are his visits 100+ compared with 60s? This can be more informative than 180s alone.

Career Highlights

Major Titles and Notable Runs

Gurney has achieved standout results at the highest level, including major TV success and deep runs that confirm he can handle big-match pressure. When you?re assessing a veteran profile, these runs matter because they demonstrate a ceiling that can reappear when conditions and confidence align.

• Key note for bettors: A proven stage record can make him more reliable in high-profile matches than his recent floor-only stats suggest.
• Key note for analysts: Past titles don?t guarantee current form, but they can inform expectations about nerve in deciders and key legs.

Breakthrough Moments and Milestones

Like many top professionals, Gurney?s career has been shaped by a handful of breakthrough periods where his scoring and finishing clicked at once. Those periods often show a recognisable data signature: first 9 rises, 180 rate climbs, and doubles settle into a dependable band rather than swinging wildly match-to-match.

Rivalries and Signature Matches

Gurney has featured in plenty of notable contests against elite opposition, and those head-to-heads can be useful if you treat them correctly. Don?t overvalue a single ?favourite win?; instead, look at:

• Head-to-head by era: Old meetings may not reflect current level.
• Match conditions: Stage vs floor, crowd factor, and match distance.
• Performance stats in losses: If he averaged well but lost on doubles, it can indicate volatility rather than a bad matchup.

Best Matchups and Risk Factors

Opponents and Styles That Suit

Gurney can be well-suited to opponents who give chances on doubles or who rely on streaky finishing. When he?s scoring steadily, he?s very capable of ?hanging around? and then punishing a bad leg from the other side.

• Often suits: Players with high missed doubles, or those who struggle to hold throw consistently
• Also suits: Opponents whose scoring falls off after the first 6 darts (Gurney?s steady pace can capitalise over a full leg)
• Match-flow angle: If he breaks early, he can become difficult to reel in because he tends to play percentage darts protecting a lead.

Common Weak Spots (If Any)

No pro is flawless. The key risk with Gurney is that if the T20 isn?t cooperating and the cover shots aren?t tight, he can bleed legs without applying enough pressure at the business end. That?s when missed doubles become more damaging: not only are chances missed, but there are fewer of them.

• Watch-outs: Low first 9, repeated 60s, and delayed first finish chances
• Pressure leak: If he falls behind early, he may need a burst of 140+ scoring to recover; if that burst doesn?t arrive, the match can drift.

Format and Distance Effects

Distance matters because it changes the value of volatility. In shorter matches, one poor doubling leg or one opponent purple patch can decide the outcome. In longer matches, class and resilience have more time to show.

• Short formats: Higher upset risk; favour players with fast starts and immediate scoring.
• Mid-length: Often a sweet spot for reading Gurney?s baseline; his experience can matter without requiring a marathon.
• Long formats: Consider stamina, emotional control, and whether his scoring holds up after early missed chances.

How to Use This Profile

What to Check Before a Match

• Event type: Stage or floor, and the match format (legs vs sets).
• Last 10?20 matches: Filter by similar conditions to today?s match.
• First 9 vs overall average: Identify whether the issue (if any) is scoring or finishing.
• Checkout efficiency: Combine checkout % with missed doubles and darts at doubles.
• Opponent profile: Does the opponent tend to miss doubles, start slowly, or play at a very fast tempo?

Interpreting Stats Without Overreacting

Darts is high-variance at leg level. A player can win while missing a stack of doubles if the opponent misses more, and a player can lose with a strong average if one or two key checkouts don?t go. Treat single-match stats as a clue, not a verdict.

• Avoid: Building a conclusion off one hot or cold match.
• Prefer: Rolling trends across 8?15 matches in similar conditions.
• Reality check: If a ?bad? match still produced a competitive leg count, the underlying level may be fine.

Tracking Improvements Over Time

If you?re monitoring Gurney across a month or a season, use a consistent framework:

• Scoring: First 9 average and 100+ visit rate (if available) to confirm baseline sharpness.
• Finishing: Checkout % paired with missed doubles to separate variance from decline.
• Clutch legs: Decider record and performance in legs 9?11 (or equivalent pressure points) in best-of-11/13 matches.

Two practical betting scenarios (educational examples):

• Scenario 1: Match winner vs leg handicap (best of 11 legs)
  You?ve got a stage match where Gurney?s last 12 stage matches show steady first 9 scoring and a solid checkout trend, while the opponent?s recent profile shows frequent missed doubles. Instead of taking a short match-winner price, you might compare it to a leg handicap such as Gurney -1.5 legs (win by 2+ legs). Example scorelines that land: 6?4, 6?3, 6?2. If the market offered Gurney -1.5 at 2/1 while match winner was much shorter, you?d be weighing whether his edge is strong enough to expect more than a one-leg squeak.
• Scenario 2: Total legs line (best of 13 legs)
  Suppose both players? recent splits show high hold-throw rates and middling break conversion. That often points towards a tight match with plenty of holds. If the total legs line is Over 11.5 legs, it requires a score of 7?5 or 7?6 (or the equivalent depending on format). An example price might be 10/11. The stat-led logic is not ?they?re evenly matched?, but ?they?re both likely to hold often, so the match needs fewer breaks to reach 12+ legs?.

FAQs

What is Daryl Gurney’s best format?

Gurney is often at his most dependable in mid-length legs formats (for example best-of-11 or best-of-13), where steady scoring and experience in key legs can decide matches. Always confirm with the format filter on DartsStats.com, as performance can vary by season.

What are Daryl Gurney’s strongest stats?

When he?s playing well, the strongest indicators are usually a healthy first 9 average (creating early chances) and a stable checkout profile across multiple matches rather than isolated spikes. His 180 output can also rise sharply when his T20 is dialled in.

What should you look for in Daryl Gurney’s recent form?

Focus on trends across the last 10?20 matches in the same environment (stage or floor). In particular, check whether his first 9 average is holding up and whether missed doubles are clustering in close defeats.

Which doubles does Daryl Gurney prefer?

Like most pros, preference can vary by setup route and what?s left after scoring, but the key is whether he?s consistently leaving a comfortable finish rather than drifting into awkward splits. Use match stats to see if his finishing is clean on his most common routes.

Does Daryl Gurney perform better on stage or floor?

It can differ by period, which is exactly why stage vs floor splits matter. Don?t rely on an overall blended average; compare stage-only and floor-only performance over a meaningful sample to see where his scoring and doubling are most stable.

How often does Daryl Gurney hit 180s?

His maximums tend to come in bursts when the T20 is working. Rather than using one match, use his 180 rate across a run of matches and compare it to his first 9 average to confirm whether it reflects genuinely sharp scoring or a short-term spike.

The Final Throw

Daryl Gurney is a player where context matters: stage vs floor, legs vs sets, and whether the recent data shows sustainable scoring or just a couple of highlight performances. Use this profile to build a rounded view: start with first 9 average and overall average, then layer in checkouts, missed doubles, and format splits to find the real story behind the results.

If you?re using these insights for betting, aim to match the market to the evidence. A leg handicap needs confidence in separation (not just ?likely to win?), while totals are often better supported by hold/break patterns and tempo stability. Above all, avoid overreacting to one hot average or one poor doubling match?darts swings quickly, and disciplined sampling is your edge.

Gamble responsibly: set a budget, avoid chasing losses, and treat betting as entertainment rather than income. If it stops being fun or feels hard to control, take a break and seek support.